Friday, 26 February 2016

The Safe Schools Coalition and Why This Is Not An Issue

Normally, I would be posting a news link on this, then delving into the article in a little more detail to provide some context. Not today folks.

No doubt, it's been noted in the media by now that the Safe Schools Coalition is under review, thanks in part to the ACL (among others) complaining. The amount of mudslinging from both sides on this subject is utterly horrendous and in the interests of keeping the topic to well...the topic, I decided not to put it up here. (In addition, while I'm 100% straight, this topic has hit a bit of a raw nerve with me in terms of the bullying going on.)

When I got wind of this however on Reddit (at the moment, probably the most reliable source for me in terms of actually GETTING the articles),

The concerns with the Safe Schools program include (and why these are flawed arguments):

  • Pushing an "Agenda" onto other individuals: Most of the time, people aren't able to explicitly state what that "agenda" is at all. In a further twist of irony, the groups who tend to make that claim do often have an agenda in question and aren't simply doing it out of the goodness of their hearts. 
  • Denying "competing views" or a "reasonable debate": This argument most commonly tends to be held by groups who view that there's too much exposure on "the other side" of the argument and not enough to argue their point. This would make logical sense if the view was say, that Muslims were all horrible individuals and they weren't being allowed to show what real Muslims are like, but when asked for their arguments, they tend to fall into the traps of logical fallacy, reliance on a religious text or some other argument that does not in any way, shape or form address the actual issue at hand. 
  • The "Too sensitive" or "Too PC" argument: The second part seems to refer more to this idea that we have to be "PC" (which ignores the point of what politically correct actually refers to) and therefore can't piss someone off without consequence, while the first part refers more to this idea that we've become too soft as a society and need to "toughen up" more. If someone can actually show me (with scientific backing) that we are becoming too PC/soft, then I might retract the following, but until then, the people who use thesse arguments are nothing more than bullies who have had their way for far too long, get away with it scot-free, are finally getting called out for their behaviour and cannot deal with the consequences. 
  • The "Discrimination" argument: This one seems to refer more to this idea that it's discrimination to have set spaces for one group but not another (i.e,. a women's space but not a man's space), or that one group is being allowed to form, but the "opposing" group is banned from campus/school (good example with the school side is that a public school is OK with having a Christian prayer group, but a Muslim prayer group is not allowed). I'll make this one nice and simple: if you feel that you are being discriminated against, then go ahead and raise hell by lodging a complaint with the Equal Opportunity board in your state or the Human Rights Commission if you so desire. Just be prepared to argue your case before a tribunal. 
  • The "Oppression" argument: See above on the "Too sensitive" argument/reasonable debate subject. Simply put, unless you are being jailed explicitly for your beliefs/identity and not for your actions (i.e. you're jailed for being gay, not because you assaulted another man) then yes, you can claim you're being oppressed. If your school, place of worship or other building has been torched to the ground, vandalised or similar because you are of a particular race, religion, ethnicity or sexuality, then yes, you can claim oppression. If you are being beaten up, fired, denied jobs or other services (that are the only option out there) because of your beliefs or sexuality, then yes, you can claim oppression. Until then, this argument fails. 
  • The "Taxpayer dollar" argument: Usually this argument takes on the idea that "Why should my taxpayer dollars go towards this thing I don't support?" Aside from the fact that you have no direct control over where your tax dollars go (i.e. they don't specifically allocate your money to roads or welfare), this argument really shows a lack of knowledge about how the tax system actually works. On top of that, most of these rooms are usually funded by the university or student union or even the students themselves. In other words, no taxpayer funds needed. 
So, I've given quite a number of the arguments that are against the Safe Schools Coalition, that do not delve into the outright homophobic comments, along with why these are failed arguments. 

Now comes the question: well, what can I (as a parent or student) do about these things? 

Children in Primary/High School: 
  • TALK TO YOUR KIDS. Seriously. Have an open and honest discussion about sexuality and gender identity. If you don't know something, admit it to your child, but also actually go and start looking for resources so you and your child can learn together. Good places to start are your local library, community centre, GP, youth/family health clinics or sexual health clinics (the latter tend to be staffed by nurses and GPs who can answer questions as well). 
  • If your child does come out as something other than straight, be supportive. There are a number of support groups out there for parents of non-straight children and I would highly recommend a face-to-face group over an online one. PFLAG is a good place to start. I wouldn't fret about how it'll "look" to others-it's not worth your time or theirs. 
  • In a similar vein, should your child turn out to be straight, don't celebrate it as a good thing-just see it for what it is. 
  • For parents with younger children, there are a few books out there that are age-appropriate and simply discuss different families (The Family Book by Todd Parr is an excellent resource for this, I cannot recommend it enough as it covers many different families, not just families with two mums/dads or one of each). At that age, it can just be a simple explanation on homosexuality, bisexuality, transgenderism and intersex, without getting too far into the nuances. (I.e. "Some boys grow up to fall in love with other boys, some girls grow up and fall in love with other girls, some people fall in love with both boys and girls, some people feel they were born in the wrong body and try to change it and some people don't feel that they're boys or girls.") 
  • If your child is trans, get them to a therapist as soon as possible. 
  • If you are from a religious background, try to avoid shunning someone on those grounds alone. You'll find that there are priests/rabbis/imams/whatever who are just as supportive of non-straight worshippers and depending on what branch of the religion you follow, there are places of worship that are a little more open with sexuality.
Teachers/Schools:

  • If you aren't part of the Coalition already, it may be worth raising it as an idea at the school. Some of the issues to consider will relate to how the "All of Us" resource (which is likely the centre of the controversy) is used in the classroom, but it is entirely possible to incorporate this into your existing sex ed curriculum.
  • If you aren't part of the Coalition, or your school refuses to implement the Coalition for whatever reason suggested, it is still possible to act as a supportive person for LGBTI individuals. Consider the possibility of becoming a school "Ally." (meaning someone who is supportive of LGBTI individuals, especially if your school lacks a counsellor or psychologist) It may be worth raising it with the principal or education department on the idea of you undertaking some training if you wish to take it further. 


Monday, 22 February 2016

Board Of The News: Safe Schools...for everyone? (or how an antigay protest backfired spectacularly)

There is actually a link to this with education believe it or not. The program that is being targeted though, is not part of the curriculum as such, but is designed purely for schools.







The program in question is known as the Safe Schools Coalition and is 100% optional. It runs in a number of schools across Australia that includes public, private, primary, secondary and religious schools. The main aims of the Coalition are to reduce homophobia, educate individuals on LGBTI issues without it being based on myths or stories and also to allow individuals who may not necessarily be straight to come out as such and not get attacked for it. The program also has sponsorship from pretty much every Sexual Health educator in the country, some of which are government funded. 

Most of the goals of the Coalition are school-wide. That is, if there are changes, they tend to affect overall school policy or certain events ie uniform policies, anti-bullying policies and expanding school formals to allow for same-sex/transgender individuals. The rest are mostly aimed at certain specific events supporting the LGBTI community and whether or not the school opts to celebrate those events is entirely up to them (the Coalition does talk with schools on this and tailors the program accordingly). 

Now that all the background information is out of the way, let's get on with the meat of this post. 

A charity group, Minus18 (which focuses on disadvantaged LGBTI individuals), opted to host an event that was designed for LGBTI individuals and their allies to attend (as while many schools have signed up to the Coalition, it does take a while for things to change). Unfortunately, a group that was attacking the Safe Schools Coalition (fitting named the STOP Safe School Coalition, or SSSC) decided that this event was linked to the Coalition and opted to try and force a shutout. That is, they planned on buying all of the nonrefundable tickets to the event, then ripping them up and effectively denying actual eventgoers a chance to attend. So going along in their merry glory, they snapped up all of the early bird tickets ($10). 

At this point, I should note two things:

1) An ally is anyone who supports LGBTI individuals and makes a point of it. They do not need to necessarily be LGBTI themselves. So yes, you can be 100% straight and still attend this formal. The aim was just to have a nice formal event where you can be outside the norm and not get bullied for it.

2) Minus18 and the Safe Schools Coalition have almost zero links to each other, except for the fact that Minus18 occasionally receives funding from the Coalition (not for this event though). 

What the SSSC missed however, is that the ticketing system this year, is in fact, crowdfunded. Yup, it's 2016 and they completely missed that crowdfunding is still very much a thing. How the plan would actually work is that when you bought a "ticket" online, you were actually sponsoring a ticket for someone else. Those individuals who actually wanted to attend the event had to contact Minus18 directly (either by phone or in person), put their name down on a list and they would receive a ticket on the night. For every $40, it gave a chance for someone to attend the event for free. Their original goal was $15,000 (which would've allowed for around 375 people to attend)

So, as of 23/2/2016, they have now raised just over $45,000. This means that a whopping 1,125 people can attend the event. The early bird tickets that were sold? Nothing but a puddle in the middle of the ocean. In other words, by effectively denying people a $10 ticket, the Coalition have now actually allowed more people to attend.

To my understanding, Minus18 have opted to move to a larger venue and any money raised for the event after the formal will be going towards a similar formal event happening in Adelaide later this year.

Update:  As of the 26/2/2016, they have raised $46,000.

Unfortunately, this has come with a consequence in that the Safe Schools Coalition is now subject to a governmental enquiry. I will cover this issue in another post.

Thursday, 18 February 2016

In-Depth Info: Steiner and Waldorf Schools (not a Muppet school)

No, I am not referring to grumpy old puppets that fill the role of the peanut gallery on The Muppets. You may have heard of these occasionally in the media. You may have seen The Simpsons feature one of these schools in a somewhat recent episode. They tend to be associated with the "hippy" culture and are associated with teaching kids anything but English, Maths and Science.

Well, this post should hopefully take some of the myths and facts around the Waldorf system (from here on out, I'll refer to them as Steiner schools/streams to avoid confusion with some schools that have similar names i.e. Walford Anglican School) and take a good look at them. 

First off, what the Steiner system actually is all about:
The Steiner system of education is probably a good example of an "alternative education" method and may also be the one likely people will think of when they hear "alternative school". The system is in theory, meant to be more actively tailored towards child development based on a combination of actual research and the theories of Rudolf Steiner, the creator of the system. As kids grow, there are certain behaviours that they will exhibit and thus, the curriculum for that age group is tailored towards those certain behaviours or allows children to relate to other individuals with those behaviours (An example of this would be the tendency for 11-12 year old kids to want to "conquer" everything, so they will study the Roman empire). Steiner schools and streams aim for a more holistic approach compared to the mainstream (this does not mean that the mainstream system is not holistic) and their methods are more imaginative and play-based. This does not necessarily mean that the child is missing out on things that a child in the mainstream would have, but rather that the child in a Steiner system works towards the same goal in a different way. For example, basic maths functions (addition, subtraction and so on) are taught through stories and they are given a chance to practice it through play. Quite a few schools have adopted some play-based elements, but they are not necessarily Steiner schools or using Steiner teachings. The curriculum is also quite broad and does cover a few things that might be skipped over in the mainstream, however, there are also some things that the mainstream will cover that are skipped over in the Steiner system (usually for good reason).

And when I say holistic, children are not necessarily receiving a religious education per se. Rather, holistic is more about covering the physical, intellectual, emotional and spiritual aspects of the child. 

So why are they called Waldorf Schools? Is there a difference?
No. The name came about because Rudolf Steiner (a philosopher, architect and author among other things) in the mid 1900's developed his own ideas on education, based on observations of children and their development. Between the 1900's and 1920's, he then travelled around lecturing on these ideas in universities, mostly centred around a more holistic approach to education (instead of just focusing on cramming their heads full of knowledge) In the late 1910's, the owner of the Waldorf-Astoria Cigarette Company in Stuttgart, Germany approached Steiner and asked him about opening up a school in his factory for the children of his employees, based on Steiner's teachings. Steiner agreed and thus the first Steiner school was founded. This is where the Waldorf school name comes from: after the cigarette company. 

For consistency's sake, I'll be referring to the schools, system and streams with the Steiner name. This is also partially because the governing body in Australia for the Steiner system is known as Steiner Education Australia. Schools running under the Steiner system either in its entirety or simply offering it as a stream alongside the mainstream children tend to use the terms interchangably, but they're all otherwise the same.

What are Steiner's theories on child development?
See here. It should also be noted that Steiner had four main criteria for his schools, some of which I'll cover a little further below. These criteria are:

-The school is open to all children.
-The school must be coeducational 
-The school is a twelve-year school
-The teachers have primary control over what is taught, rather than the state or other funding sources.

Apart from the last two points (not all schools have the funding to run classes up to Year 12 and most, if not all, Steiner schools take on some funding in exchange for certain requirements, but the funding is minimal [25% govt, 75% parents/school] and the requirements relate to NAPLAN, statistical data and following the curriculum set by Steiner Ed. Australia)

What are the main differences between the Steiner and mainstream systems?
There are quite a few huge differences, aside from the play-based nature in the younger years. 

  • Perhaps the biggest one is that the children don't actually start formal education until age 7. This is roughly in line with Steiner's theories on child development, some of which seem a little old-fashioned, but are in line with countries such as Finland, who also delay starting school until the age of 7. To cope with schooling law, children from ages 4-7 (they need to have turned 7 before the school year starts) will attend Kindergarten, which is often segregated from the main school for a variety of reasons (this is not uncommon with other schools who have daycares/preschools on site, but Steiner's reasoning on this is to encourage the kindy children to grow at the pace needed, rather than being "corrupted" so to speak by older children). The kindergarten program incorporates circle games, free play, songs, stories and practical activities that still encourage kids to learn, without the formalities behind it. For example, cooking is a common activity in Steiner schools and children will learn about the different grains, fruit, vegetables and so on during this process. This is no different to a preschool or the first few years of primary school.
  • Once children do start school at the age of 7, they will then stay with that teacher throughout the entirety of their primary schooling years (this practice is called "looping"). The class will also stay the same where possible. So rather at the end of the year, instead of the children scattering rooms and the teacher staying in the same place, the teacher and students will all move together. Usually composite classes do not exist, but logistics sometimes dictate otherwise and some schools do have composite classrooms (These are typically known as "Class 3/4"). How this works is another matter entirely. Some schools take the looping approach further by setting up entire buildings for each class and at the end of the year, the entire class and teacher simply move to the next building (extra classes not withstanding)
  • The other big thing you will notice is that everything where possible is "natural" or organic. There are a few different reasons for this, one of which is encouraging imagination and creativity, but this does not necessarily mean that they are entirely anti-technology or anti-science. Schools are just as likely to have computers for students as they are to have wooden toys. They will use power tools alongside traditional farming tools. They will cook over campfires and also over fully-functional kitchens. Some of the reasons behind the natural/organic approach are also based on the ideal emphasised in children that the world is "beautiful." It is also done in a way that doesn't come across overly preachy, at least to the children. (For example, they may be taught to use chicken/horse poo as a natural fertiliser as it's readily available and decreases waste, rather than being taught that using chemicals is bad). Furthermore, safety is still paramount (so with the chicken/horse poo example, the kids will be wearing gloves). That said though, the classrooms do try and minimise the use of technology where possible (you'll still find an old-fashioned blackboard for instance) and in most cases, children are not introduced to computers until high school (that doesn't necessarily stop them from knowing about this stuff outside of school, but apart from a library search catalogue, most Steiner schools discourage or outright ban students from computer use until high school)
  • There is a HUGE emphasis on the Arts across the school and I mean HUGE. Children will cover the entire spectrum of arts and crafts over the years, sometimes as a part of their Main Lesson block (which I will cover in more detail below), but to give you an idea of how this works, all students in Class 1 learn how to play the lyre and pentatonic (Five-note) recorder, Class 2 learn how to play the diatonic recorder (wooden recorder similar to the recorders we've grown up with), Classes 3-7 learn how to play the recorders that we all have grown up with somewhere along the way. but they will extend this to the alto, treble and bass recorders (basically larger/lower-pitched), Class 3 students will also learn the violin, viola or cello, while Class 4 students and beyond are encouraged to pick up other instruments. Older classes will form ensembles and all students participate in regular singing activities. All children will learn how to knit, crochet, weave, do cross stitch, spin wool, wet felt and more and there is no emphasis on it being a "gendered" activity.  
  • As the schools tend to be smaller, there is a huge community involvement. The school regularly comes together for various festivals to celebrate the seasons or other events (i.e. Solstices, Equinoxes, Easter, ANZAC Day etc.), parents will help out where possible and are encouraged to participate in their child's education. On the other end of the scale, teachers will conduct home visits for the students before they start school to get to know the families and students. Working bees are regularly offered and school fairs are typically held twice a year.
  • The school day is also a little different. For the children actually in school, the day usually begins with a Main Lesson, which I will cover in a minute. Between recess and lunch, practice lessons in English and Maths occur (sometimes supplementing the main lesson), along with foreign languages (in some schools this is two languages, most schools in Australia do one foreign language), art and craft activities and generally more "creative" activities. After lunch, the more active classes are taught such as PE, gardening, woodwork and so on. This is usually a case of "where possible" rather than being strictly adhered to, as logistics sometimes dictate this doesn't happen.
  • The classrooms are also VERY different, in that there are no smartboards, no iPads, in fact, no technology where possible. I will cover a bit about this in a minute.
  • Finally, aside from the curriculum changes, there are two other units that are unique to Steiner education: Eurhythmy and Bothmer. The former starts from kindergarten, while the latter usually doesn't start until Class 4. 
So what is the Main Lesson?

The Main Lesson is a block at the start of each school day for students in Classes 1-12. This is where the bulk of the more "traditional" subjects take place and the theory behind this is that the children's minds are most active in the morning. The content of the lesson will depend on a combination of the year level and the point of the year. The areas however, are English, Maths, Science, History, Geography and Civics (with some areas, such as Economics falling under the Maths/Science area). These blocks are taught for around 3-4 weeks at a time and will swap around regularly.

In Australia, as all schools are by law required to follow the Australian Curriculum where possible, Steiner schools were required to also set up a national curriculum that is followed by all Steiner schools or Steiner streams. This curriculum was also required to show where the link was between the Australian Curriculum and the Steiner one, with the main exemption being ICT (and even then, the exemption only applies until Class 8, at which point IT skills are taught)

http://www.steinereducation.edu.au/curriculum/steiner-curriculum/

The Main Lesson topics are listed below: 

Class 1: Form drawing (2 main lessons on this), The Alphabet: letters, Letters to Texts, Stories from The Dreaming/Sentences, Ancient World Tales, Local Surroundings x 2, Numbers, Counting and Informal Processes: Grouping, Number Processes x 2. 

Class 2: Celtic Narratives, Fables, Saintly Lives, World Legends, Local Surroundings x 2, Times Tables and Number Patterns, Place Value, Magic Numbers, Layout of Sums, Form Drawing.

Class 3: Literature of Creation and Tradition*, Literature of Authority/Rulership*, Grammar, Reading Program, Farming and Gardening, Building, Mathematics Processes and Strategies, Measurement: Length, Weight and Capacity; Measurement: Time; Measurement: Money; Form Drawing.

*-In schools in Australia, this typically manifests in Old Testament stories as it's an easy way to cover both of these areas. To keep the controversy to a minimum, this is covered from the Hebrew/Jewish perspective, God is referred to as "Yahweh" and so on. The children also participate in certain activities from a Jewish perspective i.e. making matzoh. Alternately, other creation stories may come into play.

Class 4: Myths of Northern Europe; Art Science and History of Writing: Pen and Ink**; The Arts of Language and Literacy; Spirituality of The Dreaming; Local Area Mapping; The Local Region; Human Being and the Animal Kingdom; Number Processes: Factors, Multiples, Long Division and Long Multiplication; Fractions x 2; Freehand Geometry and Form Drawing. 

**-This is typically around the point that children will receive their first pen. Steiner kids will actually write with a fountain pen given to them where possible, although some teachers will allow students in Class 6/7 to swap out for a rollerball pen. Prior to this, the kids will move from block crayons to stick crayons to pencil. 

Class 5: Ancient Cultures: India, Persia, Babylon, Egypt; Ancient Cultures; Greece;*** English Language and Literacy; Indigenous Life/History Geography of the Region and State; Botany; Decimals; Decimals and Fractions; The World of Mathematics; Geometry; Form Drawing. 

***-Both of the Ancient Cultures units will be split up to incorporate a Geography and Science unit. In this case, the Science units look at the history of Science and the Geography is along similar lines. 

Class 6: Ancient Cultures: History of Ancient Rome; Wonder and Wisdom of Words; English Language and Literacy; Australian History; Geology/Gardening and Horticulture****; Astronomy; Physics: Acoustics, Optics and Heat; Physics: Static Electricity and Magnetism; Business Maths: Percentages and Interest; Number and Algebra; Geometry and Measurement; Geography: Australia and Beyond. 

****-This is split into two separate areas, but is counted as a Science unit. Some schools will split the students up for Woodwork as well during this time. 

Classes 7-12: At this stage, I won't include them as the majority of schools across the country are K-6 at best, and the streams offered in some schools are K-6 only. If I do get requests to put in the 7-12 Main Lessons, I will.

What else do the students study?
Depending on the school, the other curriculum areas are covered fairly extensively. They are:

-Performing/Visual Arts: very heavily covered. I've already touched on it above, but students will receive regular lessons in at least Art, Craft and Music, with some schools also taking Drama, Dance and Circus Skills as separate units. Eurhythmy technically falls in here, but I'll cover that separately.
Art is sometimes also covered by the class teacher, as are soft crafts. Some of the areas covered in Art and Craft are very unique to Steiner education or taught uniquely, so I'll briefly list a few below:

Art/Craft: Wet-on-wet painting (diluted paint on wet paper), beeswax modelling, felting (wet), wool spinning, weaving, knitting, crochet, cross stitch, doll making/dressing.

Music is also taught very uniquely. All students learn to sing in a choir and to play the recorder up until Class 7. Class 1 students learn how to play the lyre and pentatonic recorder, Class 2 students learn the wooden recorder, Class 3 students learn a stringed instrument while Class 4 students are able to continue on with that instrument or pick up another instrument. Students may be asked to join an ensemble.

-Design/Technology: This includes woodwork, sewing, metalwork, blacksmithing and bookbinding. Gardening also falls under this subject and is a HUGE part of the curriculum. If you think of the Stephanie Alexander program that a large number of schools run, the concept is pretty much the same.

-Outdoor Education: This is covered fairly extensively across the entire curriculum with camps becoming a requirement from around Class 2 or 3 onwards. More specifically, students may study Cycling, Geology, Oceanography, Botany and Zoology. Take note these are specifically separated from biology.

-Bothmer Gymnastics: This is not a unique form of gymnastics. Rather it's more a bunch of activities around spatial awareness and just developing more movement skills. There are a few other more anthroposophical reasons behind it, but I won't get into those here. The most common form I have seen of this consists of activities with staves and involving children passing the staves to one another or jumping around them. Typically this will start around Class 4 and continue on to Class 9. And yes, this takes up a day.

-Eurhythmy: Hoo boy, where do I start with this one? The simplest way I can describe this is "performance art" or "visual music." That is, it's a visual interpretation of a piece of music. Spoken word Eurhythmy is also performed, with every word, letter and rhythm having their own gesture or movement or similar. Typically, this is a compulsory subject, but due to logistics, this may not always be taught. To get a better view of what it is, have a look at this video here.

Do they complete the Year 12 certificate?
Yes and no. Some schools do use the IB as an alternative for Year 12 students (as it requires students to have a well-rounded choice of learning areas), other schools prefer to go along the Steiner Year 12 certificate route. The schools in each state may have an agreement with the university/TAFE admissions centres in each state to recognise students who have completed the Year 12 Steiner certificate and grant them an ATAR score. The schools themselves may also provide the students with the option of if they wish to receive an ATAR score or if they just want credit for the subjects they've completed.

It should be noted that part of the Year 12 certificate for Steiner schools involves the student completing a year-long project in an area of interest. Bizarrely, this generates zero controversy compared to when the SACE (SA Year 12 Certificate) introduced this in Year 12!

Do they take the NAPLAN tests?
They are required to provide NAPLAN tests to students, but you'll find that the number of parents who pull their children out from NAPLAN tests at these schools tends to be much, much higher than other schools. The children that are given the OK to do NAPLAN tests are not singled out from their classmates (except for when they go to do the tests), nor is there any emphasis on them suddenly being taught extra skills for them to do "well" on the tests. You'll also find that those families that are OK with their kiddo sitting NAPLAN tend to recognise the value of NAPLAN as being simply a snapshot of where their kid is against the rest of the state/country, not as a tool in the great pissing contest known as parenting.

So if they are not teaching the Australian Curriculum as such, do they receive funding?
Yes they do. However, it is usually found that as the school is self-governed (compared to say, 92% of private schools that are governed by a religious body, 3-5% that are run by a corporate provider* and the remainder are self-governed), the schools tend to receive less funding from the government than say, an elite private school that is really struggling to get that extra bit of land for when they play games against other schools because the other sports ovals are too "weekly" for the away team.
This funding usually comes with the agreement that the school offers NAPLAN, submits various statistical data to the government and falls in line with the approved curriculum.

*-This is for example, a school that is run by a higher ed institution or company.

I noticed the mention of certain religions in the curriculum, is Steiner education religious at all?
No, it is not. While verses from religious texts are sometimes used as part of the morning ritual/circle, the verses in question always relate to the topic at hand (for example, a unit on light had a passage from Genesis read to the students each morning relating to light) and are not emphasised as gospel. The religious verses are usually also balanced out with verses, stories or songs from secular sources (with the light example mentioned above, another passage came from Martin Luther King Jr.).

Where religion is discussed as part of a Main Lesson topic, while the Steiner curriculum does encourage the main lesson topic be integrated into all areas of learning (hence the "holistic" experience), it is made very clear that the students are learning "about" the religion and are not being taught "the religion." Taking Class 3 for example and the Old Testament stories-while at that stage, the students may write about the stories as though they are fact, they are then taught the actual facts relating to the topic in question as they get older (Class 6 covers the birth of Christianity and students in Grades 6 and up start covering science in more detail). Class 5 does delve into Hinduism, Buddhism and even Islam to a mild degree and Class 6 covers Islam in a little more detail (alongside Christianity).

Despite all of this, the school does not have a chaplain (some use the funding instead for a support worker), does not run scripture sessions (unless mandated by law or they have an exemption), does not rely on religious donations to do anything and students of a particular faith are not discriminated against within the schooling environment (given that some schools encourage vegetarianism, this actually eliminates some of the issues around whether a particular student can eat a particular meat or not).

What about public schools with Steiner streams?
Some (not all) primary schools will offer a Steiner stream for interested students. These are usually run in line with Steiner Education Australia (that is, the school is a member and they are bound by their bylaws). These typically only cover the same age groups as the mainstream primary school, but children are not segregated from one another. How schools manage the "Kindy" part of Steiner education varies, so check with the school first. The rules around technology, classrooms, curriculum and looping are all very much the same, however, there is some degree of relaxation to account for mainstreamed children (that is, there's no flat ban on technology across the entire school and all the students are encouraged to participate in all aspects of school life, not just Steiner-only or mainstream-only) and these schools typically network with full Steiner schools.

Some schools with Steiner streams also allow mainstream students to access the same opportunities as the Steiner students in regards to their music program, but this is not always the case, so check with the school first.

Unlike "full" steiner schools however, these students do wear a uniform and the rules around enrolment among other things still apply.

Is there anything else I need to know about Steiner Education before I enrol my child?

-As I mentioned above, students in Steiner schools (not streams) do not wear a uniform. Rather, they will have a dress code. This dress code tends to be the same among schools and is aimed around practicality and comfort, as well as a few extra rules. The main rules tend to be: sensible hair, minimal to no makeup (not even nail polish), minimal jewellery, shoulders need to be covered (that is, t-shirts minimum), the torso needs to be covered (no midriff tops), skirts and shorts are to be knee length and all items of clothing need to have either no logos, emblems, numbers or letters or logos etc. no bigger than a certain size (usually the child's fist). Black tends to be a colour that schools waver on, with schools either banning it altogether, discouraging it or asking that it be kept to a minimum (eg black pants or a black-striped outfit). There are various reasons behind this and I will not get into those reasons. Shoes are usually required to be closed-in (same as any other school). Hats are usually also another requirement, but as long as they're "sunsafe" they're deemed OK (so no baseball caps, but bucket hats etc. are OK). If you are planning on sending your child to such a school, I would strongly recommend stocking up on basic t-shirts at places like Kmart or Big W. They're usually available for around $5 each and come in many colours.

-While these schools have no issues with students who eat meat, to respect all students, most cooking activities are conducted with vegetarian/vegan diets in mind. You are welcome to pack meat dishes for your child's lunch, but please respect their right to conduct a vegetarian activity. Also note that if a school says "DO NOT PACK NUT PRODUCTS", they mean it! Food allergies will still crop up in Steiner schools.

-Your child will not learn to read right away in school. Please respect this, it does not mean that they will otherwise be "late" readers, "slow", "delayed" or anything else. Education is not a race, nor is it a pissing contest despite what so many people will have you believe. There are many famous people who have attended Steiner schools from the get go and have gone to have successful careers in their field.

-How these schools handle disabilities may seem a little off to you at first, but if your child does have a disability, ask the school which outside groups they liaison with (i.e. Novita, RIDBC, Deaf Can Do and so on) for support. Just be prepared though that teachers may not always pick up on a disability at first, so if you do notice something and the teacher does not, be prepared to get outside help.

-Behaviour problems can and do unfortunately occur within a Steiner school. Some schools are great with handling this, others aren't. Just keep this in mind and try not to assume that because it's an "alternative" school, that the kids will necessarily be better behaved. (That said, they do address major issues that occur directly within the school with some degree of grace and respect for both sides, rather than automatically writing off the student who has done wrong.)

-I've already mentioned this, but you will be asked to take a more active role within the school community. Please keep this in mind.

-

Friday, 29 January 2016

Board Of The News: John Marsden's At it Again!

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/authors-new-arts-school-offers-later-start-times-to-reflect-teenagers-sleep-patterns-20160125-gmdlwk.html

I was actually a little confused when I read this piece at first and thought they were talking about Candlebark. Nope, he's actually opening a new school! Wow...

For a bit of context, John Marsden is an Australian author. A very well known Australian author. He is also the founder and principal of a school in Victoria known as Candlebark School. Formerly it was a P-10 school, it is now a P-7 school. The school itself is pretty much what I'd call a "common sense school." In other words, kids still undertake the standard lessons, but students actually get to do things that students in other schools (private and public) don't get to do either because of fear of litigation, governmental policy or some other random rule i.e. religious or cultural beliefs. It's also the only school I've come across that actually has a "Parent Code of Conduct" clearly outlined. A better idea of how Candlebark differs from other schools can be found here. The article I posted up top also points out the fact that the students spend 20 minutes in the afternoon cleaning up. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, especially given that most classrooms these days encourage (if not require) students to clean up a little bit at the end of the day, but this takes it further by not hiring cleaning staff and winds up being very similar to Japan.

As a result of his school, he's now opened up a new high school, called the Alice Miller School. The methodology is very similar to Candlebark and is also open from Year 7 onwards, giving the students the option of whether they want to stay at Candlebark or move on in Year 7 (Victoria has the primary/secondary split between Years 6 and 7). The students in Years 9 and 10 (and in some cases Year 8) will be encouraged to take on a VCE subject and why shouldn't they be discouraged? If they're smart enough to take those classes on, they should do so! The teachers will be recruited as having life experience or something very fascinating or interesting. This isn't necessarily a reflection of age either-for example, one of the teachers has a PhD, while another teacher spent her childhood years living in Africa, Europe and Australia.

Both schools will be run under the very same methods-all the students will participate in the school life as much as the staff (instead of this ideal that the students are the "future princes or princesses" that some schools seem to run by), children will be given the chance to experience things that other schools don't necessarily do (see my point above-a solid example of this would be using chainsaws and building/starting campfires). The students are still supervised and are shown how to do things safely, but they're allowed to do them!

Most importantly, the fees are actually fairly solid and are very inclusive. That is, the only "extra" costs from the parents are for individual music lessons and optional fencing tutoring. The cost is around 11k-13k per year and that also covers camps, stationery, textbooks, excursions, bus fare you name it (and they pride themselves on undertaking regular camps). This is in comparison to most private schools where the extra costs include uniforms, textbooks, stationery, camps, excursions and other "special" events which can easily turn a $8-$9000 fee up to $12,000.

It'll be interesting to see how this school works out long-term and I hope to see him opening schools interstate soon! Hell, I'd work there! ^_^

Board Of The News: Private Schools and children with disabilities

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/disabled-children-shut-out-of-private-schools-20160120-gma5f9.html

I could label this "Private schools openly discriminate and proudly flout the law," but I know that not all schools are like this and it really wouldn't be fair on those that do follow the rules.

The article looks at a number of complaints lodged with advocacy groups and in some cases, the Equal Opportunity Board for each state or the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC). There are reports of wealthy private schools refusing to take a child because "They have their quota of autistic children", they "can't afford them" (but can afford a new pool and gymnasium?), demanding NAPLAN results to screen out children with learning disabilities (I've already spoken about why NAPLAN should not be used for this purpose) or in some cases, parents being asked to pay extra to fund a teacher's aide.

This, quite frankly, does not surprise me. I do recall my uni lecturers (many of whom do actually work in both the public and private sector as teachers, principals, consultants or members of governing bodies such as the Association of Independent Schools) describing this phenomenon and unfortunately, it does also extend to some public schools. Even though public schools by law cannot refuse entry to students, it does not exempt them from otherwise discriminating against students with disabilities.

Legally, both state and federal law prohibit schools from discriminating against students with disabilities. Why on earth do they need to include state law? a) to cover those areas where federal law does not apply (i.e. a pub), b) to solve matters before they need to turn federal and c) to cover those cases where federal law would not necessarily apply (i.e. carer responsibilities sometimes fall under "Disability").

It's not always bad for the school however, with HREOC providing a report that shows cases where the comissioner has found the education sector to be acting lawfully, those cases including children being disciplined for their behaviour within reason*, lack of special programs for individuals with a disability to gain entry into courses or programs for disabled students period and parents or students not reading the manual before enrolling (that is, they enrolled in their child in a school designed for their disability, but the school did not cater for said disability in the way that they wanted).

*-the general rule of thumb is that provided the school is consistent with their discipline policy, they will otherwise work within reason for that child (i.e. after he's warned about misbehaving, he might be asked to spend some time helping the principal instead of going straight to timeout, but if he misbehaves again, he goes to timeout) and the behaviour is not consistent with the disability (i.e. child with spina bifida cyberbullying another child, spina bifida does not cause children to not know that bullying is wrong), the school is usually regarded as having acted "lawfully."

On the other side, there are also cases where the school will eventually work with the parent after conciliation, with HREOC providing several cases of this here.  These cases tend to vary along the entire spectrum of needs including complaints of access, not catering for needs, leaving a child out of an activity due to their disability and failure to provide "reasonable" adjustments. What counts as reasonable is usually decided through conciliation, or failing that, the commissioner.

Taking these points in mind, I know there will be some people who will claim "But my child attends this wealthy private school and they DO take on children with disabilities!" Here's a little test for you: find out how much of a fight the parents had to put up to get the child into the school. Ask how much support that child genuinely gets during the day. If those children are granted the exact same opportunities as mainstream students (i.e. attending excursions, camps and being allowed to represent the school in areas beyond "disability") and most importantly, if those children are encouraged to participate in the NAPLAN and (if they're in high school) if they're allowed to graduate Year 12 from the school (every state has a modified Year 12 certificate for individuals with disabilities). Just because your wealthy private school takes a child with a disability on, doesn't necessarily mean that they're receiving the best possible education they can receive. The responses will depend on whether or not the school is more focused on image than on actually learning.

So, what can we (or you) do to ensure that children with disabilities receive the best possible education out there?


  • If a private school demands a child's NAPLAN results and does not have other criteria for entry (such as an audition), question why they require the results. Most states have a rule forbidding entrance exams of any shape or form for this reason. NAPLAN in this instance could be argued as an "entrance exam." The same rule also applies for any medical records (barring immunisation-that is legal under public health law). 
  • Be prepared to fight if needed and document everything. Every day you visited the school, what was said during the meeting (if you can tape it even better, however some states have laws against this so check those laws first), any phone conversations, emails, you name it. The more information you have, the better prepared you are for conciliation if it comes to that. 
  • If the school makes any claims around financial hardship, ask for proof of these and be prepared to negotiate in a way that doesn't affect you negatively. Depending on the disability, contacting other organisations (i.e. SPELD for dyslexia) may be needed and it may be helpful for the school to know where to go.
  • If the disability is an "invisible" one (i.e. dyslexia), come armed with knowledge of support services. 
  • And above all else, remember that you do NOT need to settle for second best because your child has a disability. 


Sunday, 24 January 2016

Board Of The News: It's go, go go for the summer holidays!

http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/the-kids-that-dont-stop-for-the-summer-holidays-20160106-gm06rs.html

While the article makes this initially sound like a bad thing, or it's the parent's fault for pushing all this crap onto their son, I do have to applaud Fairfax for taking a very balanced approach on the subject and trying to avoid it becoming too preachy.

The article specifically does recount what Leon, an 8-year-old boy does during the school holidays. More specifically, he continues practicing his literacy and numeracy skills through an online program called Kumon, practices violin, plays golf, attends karate, swimming and acting classes. This generally gets written off as a bad thing by other sources (i.e. News Corp) or is otherwise seen as a parent pushing it onto their children. In this case, it's actually the other way around and his mum gave him the option to stop, but he refused to!

The experts in the article do also stress the importance of play and that it should be the child's decision to explicitly learn and take things at their own pace during the holidays (i.e. what Leon is doing) and not the parent's decision. I also know this will likely get flames later, with suggestions that letting the kids learn at their own pace is going to turn them "soft" or "stupid" by the time they leave high school. This isn't necessarily the case-the Montessori system relies to some degree on self-paced learning and studies have found that there's no discernable difference between children in the Montessori system and the mainstream (One such study can be found here). In Leon's case, he attends a mainstream school (albeit private) and is praised for his efforts.

One thing that we all tend to forget as well is that children never do stop learning, even if we don't think they are learning. Learning is not just pen-to-paper test, test, test or organised activities/practices. A child for example, would be practicing teamwork, social skills and parenting skills in the home corner at daycare, while they would be practicing their gross motor and creativity skills pretending to be pirates in the playground. Similarly, they might be practicing their reading skills calling out brand names in the shops (there is a name for this: "environmental print") or their maths skills by using play money.


Studies:

 Lopata, Christopher; Wallace, Nancy V; Finn, Kristin V (2005). "Comparison of Academic Achievement Between Montessori and Traditional Education Programs", Journal of Research in Childhood Education 20/1, pp. 5-13

Saturday, 9 January 2016

Board of the News: When Teachers Get Bullied

http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/bullying-parents-nsw-principals-among-most-threatened-in-australia-20160107-gm0weu.html

While the article in question refers more to NSW principals (then again, it is a NSW-based newspaper), the overall message still seems to be clear: it is apparently OK to abuse teachers and principals over the pettiest crap. I know what you're thinking "Oh no, my child goes to a private school, the teachers don't get abused there!" or "Oh no, those students are out of control!" The article makes a few points clear:


  1. It is actually the parents who are engaging in this sort of behaviour, not the students. (Student behaviour is for another article)
  2. The reports are coming as part of a study that has been ongoing since 2011 and there is a graph that shows the trends occurring, both at specific years and also as an overall pattern, with conflicts and quarrels (i.e. verbal fights that might get out of hand) being among the most common issue reported. For 2015, there was an increase in all areas apart from conflicts and quarrels (which dropped a bit) and sexual harassment claims, (which stayed roughly the same).
  3. There is actually no difference between private and public schools in the survey-over 4000 principals were interviewed and the data found there was very little difference between them.
  4. While the article acknowledges that schools in large rural towns tend to be among the worst, this is likely more to do with the "everyone knows everyone" mentality rather than any view that country folks are more "primitive" than city folk. (that and limited resources, but that's for another time) 
This isn't anything new either: a former principal of the Coober Pedy Area School was run out of town in the early 2010's by parents (and eventually the school) after complaints that her methods were "too strict." Those methods? Enforcing the uniform and truancy policies that the school had previously set and updating new ones. Some reports suggest that she should've been a little flexible with those policies (i.e. if a parent was able to prove that there were factors outside of their control that stopped their kid from getting to school on time, then leniency would be needed), but did not receive any support to do so, which arguably made things worse. To further add insult to injury, after the principal was ousted, the truancy rate went up, suspensions almost doubled and student engagement in learning dropped. It eventually came out that there was a Facebook campaign to run her out of town, the principal sued five of the bullies for defamation and settled with four of them out of court (with the fifth being ordered to pay $40,000 to her by the court). 

While there seems to be this view of "parents know best," the fact does remain that the parents do not always see what goes on in schools during the day and that because they are paying for their child to attend a school (even in public schools, there are usually fees attached for materials, excursions and so on), there is this view that they are therefore allowed to whinge if they don't get their way. 

The issue however, is not nearly as simple as the article makes it out to be. There are quite a number of factors that come into play when it comes to both sides and the issues that are raised, including:

  • Dealing with children being bullied (and the bullies themselves) on both the parent and school side. 
  • Lack of funding for children with disabilities (both mainstreamed and segregated children*)
  • Lack of funding and training for children who are diagnosed as gifted and talented (this is referring to those children who have been tested by a psychologist.)
  • Government policy on a number of areas (this affects the areas above)
  • Lack of training in particular areas (teaching degrees can only cover so much and teacher training doesn't always cover those areas that need looking at)
  • Parent attitudes, work ethics and how much support they give their children outside of school.
  • Parent attitudes towards their children's behaviour. (i.e. do they also punish their child if their child got into a fight or do they let it slide) 
  • Outside beliefs and attitudes that can influence all of the above (i.e. this view that teachers are overpaid and don't work outside the school holidays, or that bad teachers are protected by the system. Both are huge myths)
  • Conflict management from the school on issues that are genuine. (i.e the bullying issue, but also things like teachers outright abusing a child with witnesses in the room)
  • Outside beliefs and attitudes towards particular students in the classroom (yes, this actually happens-the common ones that are raised are pregnant girls and students from refugee backgrounds) 
  • And finally, parents understanding (or lack thereof) of government policies or even the law. (One example cited in the article was of a parent who physically abused a principal when the parent couldn't get a refund for an excursion his child didn't attend due to said child being ill. From the other side, the "my child is ill" excuse does not work for excursions/camps if you are not prepared to back them up with a medical certificate from the GP). 
*-when I say segregated, I am referring to children who are placed in a "special" class, unit or school with other children like them. These classes may or may not be part of a mainstream school.

Let me make one thing clear: it is NEVER OK to abuse school staff. Ever. Aside from the obvious legal issues that surround this (and yes, it is illegal), you do not always know the full story and may not know for reasons that relate to the law or protection of the students involved. Schools do have a right to protect their students from harm and that harm can come from parents just as much as it can come from strangers or other students. If a school is a little "manufactured" on the response to a situation, there is usually a valid reason for it-it is not always a sign of a coverup. As much as you may think otherwise, students who are "in the wrong" do have the same rights as any other child and this rule also extends to teachers. 

If you do have a legitimate complaint or you are sure that there is an issue that needs to be nipped in the bud, consider these points:

  1. Do your research on the matter. If the issue relates to a child's behaviour (bullying, being punished or similar), get reports on what has been going on from teachers. Don't just go straight to the classroom teacher or homegroup teacher-get accounts from specialist teachers and any other staff who have regular contact with your child as well. Ask for these in writing. Even if it takes a while, it will at least alert the school that something's up (both parents and schools have been guilty of not noticing things until the other party points it out). 
  2. If the school cannot give you an outcome to a certain situation, ask them why they can't. If they give the "legal reasons" disclaimer, follow up on that legal reason by finding the legislation. Do this yourself-the school can't always quote that law offhand, especially if administration staff are speaking on behalf of the student or there are a variety of laws that come into play here. AustLii is an excellent source for this. Other reasons usually relate to student's privacy-this is to protect them from retaliation or by them suddenly becoming the victim (this is in line with whistleblowing law) or alternately avoiding the parent blowing the incident out of proportion (the recent "Roosh V" scandal is a good example of this)
  3. If the school makes it clear that certain policies apply outside of school, they apply outside of school. These rules typically are more to do with a student in school uniform committing certain misdemeanours or felonies and is no different to someone in the workplace getting fired because they were snorting cocaine in their work uniform. That said, there is a line between petty offenses (i.e. student not wearing their hat when outside the school grounds and the policy says they need to) and legitimate reasons for punishment (i.e. smoking). If the reason is skewing towards the latter (this can also include students in uniform outright abusing members of the public), then consider yourself lucky that the police weren't involved and your child is escaping with a suspension (or expulsion). 
  4. Take the empathic and model-behaviour approach: if your child gets wind of the fact that you are outright abusing staff (and they do end up hearing about it sooner or later), then it's likely they'll get the idea it's OK to do the same down the line. On the empathic end, step into the shoes of the principal or teacher for a moment and consider the information you do have on the issue-is it worth an assault charge? 
  5. Sometimes schools and such do make mistakes-they are only human. If this does happen, consider the likely reasons why it occurred (not always human error and sometimes it's outside their control) and what solutions could be taken to rectify these that don't necessarily create further problems or are out of what constitutes "reasonable." There could also be a number of ways the issue could have occurred (Example: your child is allergic to nuts and has a reaction after coming home from their nut-free classroom/school one day. This could be due to the child coming in contact with something that you wouldn't expect would trigger the nut allergy (i.e. a cereal box), a child bringing in something from home that nobody realised had nuts in it (i.e. a museli bar with almonds in it), a child bringing in something you wouldn't expect to have nuts in it (i.e. chocolate), a child bringing in something that had "traces of nuts" (most schools are OK with this since expecting parents to bring in stuff that's guaranteed to be 100% nut-free can fall outside the realm of "reasonable") or a not-quite school aged child bringing in something with a nut product (I have seen this happen far too many times to count) even though they're only there for a few minutes. It could also be teacher negligence.) and indicating that you want to work together to prevent it from reoccurring will go over much smoother than outright blaming them and doing nothing yourself. 
  6. Write down the points you do want to raise with the principal or teacher. This includes any incidents you are aware that have occurred, the dates (and if possible the times) when the incident occurred, any witnesses (if there are any) and "reasonable" solutions to the situation (Hint: if the issue relates to bullying, sometimes moving the victim away from the bully is a better solution than it seems). Also ask your child what outcome they would like-far, far too often parents will take the "I know what's best" mentality when it just creates more issues and distress for that same child and the outcome that you want isn't necessarily what they want. (within reason- if a high school child says that they want to drop a subject they're getting bullied in and it's not a subject that relates to their future career/study plans, then that's not necessarily a bad thing, even if that subject is the difference between an ATAR of 70 and an ATAR of 90.) 
  7. Schedule a time to speak to the teacher/principal. Take the written points with you. This will also allow you time to cool down beforehand. On that note, come in with the mentality that yes, the school will listen and yes, the school will be willing to work with you. If the issue further relates to the management of a child with disabilities, come in with research on the best practices for a child with the same disability (teaching degrees do not always cover special needs adequately). The more you indicate that you want to work with the school on an outcome, the more likely you are to get a satisfactory response. Coming in with a knee-jerk "I'll show them" response is not going to work. 
  8. If you find that the school is not going anywhere with the issue, be prepared to come back again and again on the issue. DON'T start campaigns or petitions or even raise awareness of the issue anywhere outside of your own family, unless you are aware that there are other parents with the exact same issue (and even then, keep it to them only). Keep documentation of the visits. 
  9. And if the schools hands are tied for whatever reason, be prepared to take it above their head to the Education Department (public schools), Independent Schools Associations (all private schools) or the national governing body for a particular group of schools (i.e Catholic Ed Australia, Steiner Ed Australia, Montessori Australia). If your child's school is religious, complaining to the church will get you nowhere and depending on the church, may make things worse for everyone. 
  10. When you do submit the complaint to the national level, DON'T go to the media or make threats of such (to the school or department), DON'T inform the school you have done so (they will find out soon enough), DON'T inform other parents you have done so and finally, DON'T make threats to the school or government departments-you will get charged for it and it will affect your outcome. 
If all of these fail, then yes, by all means, pull your kid out of that school. But don't rub it in the school's face when you do yank your child out-they are a student like anyone else and while they will miss said student, they also acknowledge that kids leaving is a part of the school system. In other words, they won't suddenly be falling all over themselves and bending backwards to cater to your child at the expense of every other child or teacher.

And if you do yank your child out, DO YOUR RESEARCH ON WHAT TO DO.

A common policy of private schools is that they require a term's notice for your kid to be yanked out otherwise you will be charged full fees for the term after you leave. There are a number of reasons for this, the biggest one being around the tracking of students from school to school-there are a number of legal reasons why students need to be tracked between schools and not all of them relate to funding. Schools need to send paperwork off to the new school and in some states, there is also an identifying number that goes with that student regardless of whether they are private or public. If a student suddenly falls off the radar, it may also be a sign that the child is being abused or in more recent years, the child is being trafficked. By law, students between the ages of 6 and 15 (17 in some states) also need to be at school, so a student who disappears off the radar may also be committing an offence. If you do have a genuine reason for yanking your child out of that school that relates to the student's welfare (i.e. child suddenly becomes gravely ill and it's not viable for them to remain at the school), you can appeal and the school can waive this policy, but it is at their discretion. If you have treated the school like they are responsible for everything your child does at home, then you are far less likely to get a good decision than if you are more supportive of the school's actions.